When I visited the library last week, I picked up a new novel (which shall go unnamed) to read, thinking I would make my way through at a leisurely pace on the subway or at home during an afternoon lull. A good 300 pages would capture my attention for a while. To my surprise, it became a page turner and before I knew it, I finished reading it within five days. The writing style was simple without frills or belaboured metaphors, appropriate since the narrator was a small child. The strength of the novel came from solid story that unfolded gradually, withholding long kept secrets until two thirds of the way in. Even though the last several pages provided closure to all of the characters, the manner in which it was written seemed rushed and without the subtle details which peppered the majority of the narrative.
The reason I'm discussing this example is to say that despite the story being memorable, the lasting impression was mediocre. Don't get me wrong, the author is a talented individual and I hope she continues writing more novels. She composes work of literary fiction I would definitely seek out. However, in the conclusion of this particular novel, one relationship, between the narrator and her significant other, a subplot that created a frame story was not fleshed out. I think it needed to be further explored so the reader could see what was at stake.
Graeme Shimmin, a spy thriller writer believes that the success of a book is dependent on a satisfying ending and a "weak ending will override anything good we have achieved earlier in the book." This hones in on the point - the last thing the reader remembers will resonate the most. Also, if the ending is exactly what the reader expects, the result is a dull conclusion. So what is a writer to do? There is no absolute right answer on how to create a perfect ending. It's just not realistic, and those that do strive to find the perfect ending will be confined to the editing process until the end of time. The writer should instead aim for a conclusion that is appropriate to the characters' journeys and the themes explored in the novel.
The reason I'm discussing this example is to say that despite the story being memorable, the lasting impression was mediocre. Don't get me wrong, the author is a talented individual and I hope she continues writing more novels. She composes work of literary fiction I would definitely seek out. However, in the conclusion of this particular novel, one relationship, between the narrator and her significant other, a subplot that created a frame story was not fleshed out. I think it needed to be further explored so the reader could see what was at stake.
Graeme Shimmin, a spy thriller writer believes that the success of a book is dependent on a satisfying ending and a "weak ending will override anything good we have achieved earlier in the book." This hones in on the point - the last thing the reader remembers will resonate the most. Also, if the ending is exactly what the reader expects, the result is a dull conclusion. So what is a writer to do? There is no absolute right answer on how to create a perfect ending. It's just not realistic, and those that do strive to find the perfect ending will be confined to the editing process until the end of time. The writer should instead aim for a conclusion that is appropriate to the characters' journeys and the themes explored in the novel.


